One of the critical responsibilities of employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is to establish whether an employee is exempt from overtime payments. However, the question of how much proof is required to meet this burden remains a contentious issue.
The U.S. Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear a case that will address this significant concern. The core issue is whether a heightened "clear and convincing" burden of proof standard should be required or if a lesser "preponderance of the evidence" standard is sufficient.
At present, the burden of proof standard varies depending on the jurisdiction in which the employer and employee are located. This inconsistency creates uncertainty and complexity for employers trying to comply with the FLSA. Some regions demand a higher level of proof, while others are satisfied with a lower threshold.
If the Supreme Court decides in favor of the heightened "clear and convincing" standard, employers will face increased challenges in demonstrating that employees are exempt from overtime under the FLSA. This could lead to more rigorous scrutiny by courts and the Department of Labor, making it harder for employers to claim exemptions.
While we await the Supreme Court's decision, expected in 2025, it is crucial for employers to remain vigilant regarding FLSA exemption issues. This includes:
For more information on the FLSA and exemption standards, consider the following resources:
By staying proactive and informed, employers can better navigate the complexities of the FLSA and ensure compliance with evolving standards.
This blog aims to provide a brief overview of the burden of proof under the FLSA, the upcoming Supreme Court case, and practical steps employers can take to manage exemption issues effectively.
--
➡️Looking for ways to help your organization stay compliant?